Elite Rationality, Traditions and Pragmatic Politicians.

Authors

  • Mahatva Yoga Adi Pradana UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Abstract

The political elite move is a common phenomenon when elections will take place. Where the behavior of the converted elite has even become tradition. Look at the phenomena that occur in Indonesia today. The political elites seemed to be looking for a shortcut to gain power easily. Look for populist figures to lift personal imagery for an interest. The realization of the strategy was done by changing the party suit with all the ideology and rationality of his thinking. Even the displaced elites must willingly put off his identity as an idealistic politician in order to accommodate their political interests. Various political strategies were made by making noise by raising political content and hoax preaching. This article seeks to see how closely the political elites think with pragmatism politics through its political traditions and strategies. In addition to the current digital age, the elite behavior creates a new political space with accommodation issues that are not necessarily the truth by raising alternative facts to form new truths. This is the post-truth era where the elites begin to think rational in asserting their power. However, it does not have a major impact on the policies to be produced. Key Words : Elite, Tradition, Pragmatism Politics, Post-Truth Era

Author Biography

Mahatva Yoga Adi Pradana, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Dosen Sosiologi Agama

References

Ahmad Warson Al Munawwir, Kamus Al-Munawwir Arab Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Progresif, 1997)

Ar-RÄghib Al-AsfahÄnÄ«, Mu’jam MufrodÄt Li Al-FÄzh Al-Qur’Än, (BeirÅ«t: DÄr Al-Fikr, 2008)

Arthur W. Burk, The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Pierce, Vol. III, (Cambridge,Harvard University Press, 1958), 116.

Aslan, M., & Tasdemir, M. (2009). Is Fiscal Synchronization Hypothesis Relevant for Turkey? Evidence from Cointegration and Causality Tests with Endogenous Structural Breaks. Journal of Money.

Benvenuto, S., Howarth, D., & Norval, A. (2012). On Populist Reason by Ernesto Laclau. 633–646.

Choiriyati, W. (2018). MANIFESTASI PRAGMATISME PENDIDIKAN POLITIK (Analisis Resepsi pada Komodifikasi Berita Selebriti Politisi). LUGAS Jurnal Komunikasi, 1, 40–54. https://doi.org/10.31334/jl.v1i1.103

Farisi, M. (2017). SIRKULASI ELIT POLITIK LOKAL PADA PILKADA SERENTAK TAHUN 2015 DI PROVINSI JAMBI. 16.

Franz Magnis Suseno, Etika Dasar: Masalah-masalah Pokok Filsafat Moral,(Yogyakarta: Kanisus, 1991), 122.

Fuad Mas’ud, Menggugat Manajemen Barat, Ed. II, (Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Dipenegoro, 2015), 87.

Golose, P. R. (2019). Strategi Penanganan Firehose of Falsehood pada Era Post-Truth. 13, 10.

Hadiz, V., & Robison, R. (2017). Competing populisms in post-authoritarian Indonesia. International Political Science Review, 38, 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117697475

Harsin, J. (2015). Regimes of Post-truth, Post-politics, and Attention Economies. Communication, Culture & Critique, 8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12097

https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/04/24/15524161/drama-politik-pascapilpres?page=all

https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20180809163733-32-320924/partai-pendukung-jokowi-deklarasikan-koalisi-indonesia-kerja

https://majalah.tempo.co/read/157570/presiden-republik-indonesia-joko-widodo-tugas-pemimpin-bukan-memanaskan-suasana&user=register diakses 23 Januari 2020

https://www.kompasiana.com/yupiter/5c93a36e7a6d88747d5fad24/ketika-perang-antar-lembaga-survei-pilpres-2019-dimulai?page=all

https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20190515063431-32-394946/budiman-sujatmiko-dan-dhani-gagal-ibas-melenggang-ke-senayan

https://beritagar.id/artikel/telatah/politikus-kutu-loncat-dan-dekadensi-politik-kita

https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/ppatk-temukan-modus-baru-politik-uang-dalam-pemilu-2019/4863564.html

https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/04/26/11271161/wiranto-jangan-menyalahkan-saya-hanura-tak-lolos-ke-dpr

https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4825934/wiranto-balik-ke-lingkaran-jokowi-ksp-wantimpres-butuh-pemikiran-wise

https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/4091880/prabowo-dan-edhy-ke-istana-gerindra-dapat-2-jatah-menteri

https://mediaindonesia.com/read/detail/215461-kubu-jokowi-prabowo-saling-tuding-dan-bantah-soal-konsultan-asing

https://islami.co/amien-rais-dan-politik-yang-baperan-hingga-mengajak-malaikat/ diakses 24 Januari 2019

Jinan, M. (n.d.). Intervensi New Media dan Impersonalisasi Otoritas Keagamaan di Indonesia. 28.

Khamim, A., & Sabri, M. (2019). Konglomerasi Media dan Partai Politik: Membaca Relasi MNC Group dengan Partai Perindo. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 10, 112. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.10.2.2019.112-134

Mietzner, M. (n.d.). Reinventing Asian Populism: Jokowi’s Rise, Democracy, and Political Contestation in Indonesia. 91.

Ni’mah, M. (2016). TRANSFORMASI SELEBRITI MENJADI POLITISI: URGENSI PERSONAL FRONT DALAM RANAH SOSIAL. INFORMASI, 45, 141. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v45i2.7989

[No title found]. (n.d.). Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 05(1).

Patten, S. (2001). Populism by Paul Taggart. Labour / Le Travail, 48, 334–336. https://doi.org/10.2307/25149197

Permana, P. (2017). Local elite adjustment in Indonesia’s democratization: Case studies of North Sumatra and East Java, 1998-2013.

Ronald, I., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659

Susanti, M. (2018). Dinasti Politik dalam Pilkada di Indonesia. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 1, 111. https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v1i2.440

Toive Aartolahti, dkk, Grolier: Encyclopedia of Knowledge, Vol. XV, (United States: Acamedic American Encyclopedia, 1997), 173.

Yunus, N. R. (n.d.). Etika dan Moralitas Politik Anggota Dewan. 21.

Zaprulkhan, Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Analisis Kontemporer, Ed. I, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, Cet. III, 2016), 116.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-12

Issue

Section

Articles