Politics and Agricultural Policy Implementation in Tanzania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jppol.2022.004.01.03Abstract
Despite the fact that there is high agricultural policy density in Tanzania, implementation of the agricultural policies has remained ineffective. Studies to explain the causes of implementation ineffectiveness are vast. However, the political dimension of agricultural policy implementation is seldom systematically examined. Thus politics as a variable that can steer implementation has hitherto received a narrow focus. The article examines how the political dynamic has led to ineffective agricultural policy implementation in Tanzania. The article applies qualitative research methods. We used in-depth interviews with key agricultural and political stakeholders to uncover the effects of politics on agricultural policy implementation. Empirical data shows that the implementation of agricultural policies in Tanzania is vastly affected by politics. Politics has affected the allocation of resources required for effective policy implementation. The paper has also noted incidences of political capture in the form of threats, political interference, imprecise prioritisation, resource diversion, rent-seeking and embezzlement of policy implementation resources. Our analysis shows that politics matters in policy implementation. Politics has been a source of implementation disruptions when it is misapplied. This article champions the body of knowledge on the policy-politics dichotomy by arguing that applying politics rightly in the policy process can reduce implementation disruptions.References
Bajwa, F. (2016). Understanding the Power Relations in Health Policy Implementation in Pakistan. Doctoral Dissertation. Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh. (Unpublished).
https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/7468.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.
Birkland, T. A. (2016). An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making. Routledge.
Cantrell, D. C. (2001). Alternative Paradigms in Environmental Education Research: The Interpretive Perspective. Science and Education.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Dye, T., and DiNitto, D.M. (1983). Social Welfare: Politics and Public Policy. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Goggin, M. L., Bowman, A., Lester. J., and O’Toole. L. (1990). Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation. New York: Harper Collins.
Grindle M. S. (ed.) (1980). Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Grindle, M. and Thomas, J. (1990). ‘After the Decision: Implementing Policy Reforms in Developing Countries’. World Development, 18 (8), 1163-1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(90)90096-G.
Grindle, M. S. (2017). Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single Case Studies vs Multiple Case Studies: A Comparative Study. PhD Dissertation. (Unpublished).
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Jonsson, K., Phoummalaysith, B., Wahlstrom, R., and Tomson, G. (2015). Health Policy Evolution in Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Context, Processes and Agency. Health Policy and Planning, 30(4), 518-527. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu017.
Khan, A. R. (2016). Policy Implementation: Some Aspects and Issues. Journal of Community Positive Practices, XVI (3), 3-12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320549262_POLICY_IMPLEMENTATIO N_SOME_ASPECTS_AND_ISSUES.
Lasswell, H. D. (1958). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Meridian Books.
Malagano-Maldonado, G. (2014). Qualitative Research in Health Design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 7(4), 120–134.
Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesising the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity- Conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145-174.
DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037242.
O’Toole, L. J. (1995). Rational Choice and Policy Implementation: Implications for Interorganizational Network Management. The American Review of Public Administration, 25 (1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409502500103.
O’Toole, L. J. (2000). Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 263–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270.
Stewart, J. J., Hedge, D. M., and Lester, J. P. (2008). Public Policy: An Evolutionary Approach (3rd Ed). Boston: Thomson Wordsworth.
The Citizen. (11th May 2020). Tanzania Government Pays Cashew Growers Sh10 Billion. The Citizen Newspaper. https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/tanzania/news/tanzania-government-pays-cashew-growers-sh10-billion- 2709060#:~:text=The%20government%20has%20released%20Sh10,services%20pro viders%20amounted%20to%20Sh20.
URT. (2016). Agricultural Sector Development Programme Phase Two (ASDP II). Government Programme Document: Dar es Salaam.
URT. (2019). Taarifa Kwa Umma Kuhusu Hatua Alizochukua Waziri wa Kilimo Kufuatia Ubadhirifu Kwenye Bodi ya Korosho. Ministry of Agriculture, Dodoma. https://www.kiimo.go.tz.
URT. (2021). Wakulima Milioni 2 Wasajiliwa Kwenye Mfumo wa M-Kilimo- Bashe. Ministry of Agriculture News and Events. https://www.kiimo.go.tz.
Weinstein, L. (2011). The Politics of Government Expenditures in Tanzania, 1999-2007. African Studies Review, 54(1), 33-57.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Palme Thadey Kawishe, Ernest Theobald Mallya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Â
