Digital Everyday Maker: Praktik Governance dalam Ruang Digital

Authors

  • Ja'far Muhammad Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Wawan Sobari Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-668X
  • Ibnu Asqori Pohan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jppol.2023.005.02.02

Keywords:

governance, everyday maker, social media

Abstract

The appearance of Dr. Tirta's participation in tackling the Covid-19 pandemic went viral on social media. This study positions Dr. Tirta as an everyday maker in governance. The aim of this research is to fill the research gap in everyday maker studies, namely exploring everyday makers in a digital context. This research uses an online-based case study method that collects data from online sources. The data analysis technique consists of three stages, namely observation, combining and grouping. This study succeeded in looking at the everyday maker in the digital world, namely the form of work in the digital world and the transformation of the everyday maker concept in the digital space as follows; First, do it yourself reinforcement. Everyday makers no longer need a large number of members to create a movement because they are assisted by the digital context of the virtual world. Second, local coverage from conventional everyday makers who face local problems can now reach things that everyday makers could not reach before. Further discussion is needed regarding the effectiveness of social media for everyday makers, in other words, regardless of the influencer's identity, they do not have social capital.

References

Bang, H. P., Sorensen, E., Theory, S. A., Sep, N., Sharpe, P. M. E., & Sorensen, E. (1999). The Everyday Maker: A New Challenge to Democratic Governance All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The Everyday Maker: A New Challenge to Democratic Governance. 21(3), 325–341.

Bang, H.P., “everyday makers and Expert Citizens: Building Political Not Social Capital,” Working Paper, no. January 2004 (2004): 1–32.

Boehme-nebler, Volker. Digitising Democracy. switzerland: springer, 2020.

Hendriks, Frank, and Pieter Tops. “Everyday Fixers as Local Heroes: A Case Study of Vital Interaction in Urban Governance.” Local Government Studies 31, no. 4 (2005): 475–490.

Hewson, Claire, and David W. Stewart. “Internet Research Methods.” Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online (2016): 1–6.

Jensen, Courtney. “Celebrity everyday maker: Public Policy and the Discourse of Celebrity Surrounding Kim Kardiashian.” Public Integrity 0, no. 0 (2020): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2020.1756162.

Rowe, Pia. “MamaBakers as everyday makers: The Political Is Personal.” Policy Studies 36, no. 6 (2015): 623–639.

Sari, Qurnia Indah Permata, Wawan Sobari, and Sukaesi Marianti. “OJREK BARENG: Memperdebatkan Argumen Apati Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Publik (Studi Kasus Bank Sampah Malang).” Jurnal Borneo Administrator 16, no. 1 (2020): 23–38.

Sorensen, E. (2007). Everyday Maker Encyclopedia of Governance (M. Bevir (ed.)).

Wafiq, Khusnul. “Praktik Everydaymaker Di Pedesaan: Protes Komunitas Enomjiwo Terhadap Kegagalan Pemerintahan Desa Roworaharjo Kecamatan Laren Kabupaten Lamongan,” 2018 (Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan).

Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6e ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc, 20

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Ja'far Muhammad, Wawan Sobari, Ibnu Asqori Pohan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Â