Critical Discourse of Social Space in Urban Sustainable Development: A Neo-Marxian Social-spatial Political Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jppol.2024.006.02.03Keywords:
Critical Discourse, Sosio Spatial Politics, Sustainable Development Goal’sAbstract
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have grown prevalent in development discourse across numerous cities, incorporating economic, ecological, and social aspects. The critical discourse on social space in urban sustainable development, viewed through the lens of neo-Marxian socio-spatial politics, underscores the intricate interplay among space, power, and economy within the urban environment. The language of the SDGs is examined through the lens of capitalist economic frameworks and power dynamics in the development of urban environments. Sustainable development frequently entails intricate conflicts of interest among diverse stakeholders, including governments, corporations, local communities, and civil society organizations. Figures such as Henry Lefebvre and David Harvey engage in neo-Marxian social-spatial political critique. Manuel Castell and Edward Soja emphasize that power and spatial control frequently engender conflict through the commodification of space, illustrating that urban and rural areas are often regarded as commodities for economic profit, leading to gentrification, forced evictions, and social alienation. Economic and social disparities are manifested in spatial inequalities within urban development. Neo-Marxist socio-spatial political theorists emphasize equality, social justice, and individuals' rights to urban space. The research of SDGs is predominantly focused on the junction of economic and ecological mutualism, rather than sufficiently addressing the social and spatial components. This neo-Marxian social-spatial political approach elucidates the complexities and inequities inherent in urban development, providing an analytical framework to comprehend and tackle the issues associated with attaining sustainable and inclusive urban growth.References
Aminah, S. (2022). Implementation of Green City Surabaya: Overcoming Challenges of Local-Global and Green Capitalism Development. Jurnal Global & Strategis, 16(2), 329–356. https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.16.2.2022.329-356
Beck, D., & Ferasso, M. (2023). How can Stakeholder Capitalism contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals? A Cross-network Literature Analysis. Ecological Economics, 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107673
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bettencourt, L. M. A., & Kaur, J. (2011). Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(49), 19540–19545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102712108
Blaikie, P., & Brookfield, H. (1987). Land Degradation and Society, New York, NY: Methuen.
Burgess, E.W. The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008.
Castells, Manuel. 1977. The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1977.
Castro, C. J. (2004). Sustainable development: Mainstream and critical perspectives. Organization and Environment, 17(2), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026604264910
De Freitas Ferreira Junior, E. (2023). Sustainable Development Or Capital Sustainability? Reflections On Green Capitalism. Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade, 4(04), 01–15. https://doi.org/10.51249/gei.v4i04.1450
Dodero, A. L. 2010. An Analysis of the Rational Comprehensive Model in Selected Cities in Developing Countries. Porla University of Waterloo.
Escobar, A (1992) Planning, in Sachs, W (ed) The Development Dictionary: a guide to knowledge as power. London: Zed.
Feng, J., & Hou, H. (2023). Review of Research on Urban Social Space and SustainableDevelopment. Sustainability, 15(22), 16130. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216130
Fairclough, Norman. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
Folke, C., & Kabeger, T. (1991). Recent Trends in Linking the Natural Environment and the Economy. In C. Folke, & T. Kabeger (Eds.), Linking the Recent Trends in Linking the Natural Environment and the Economy: Essays from Eco-Eco Group (pp. 273-300). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6406-3_14
Fuchs, C. (2017). Critical Social Theory and Sustainable Development: The Role of Class, Capitalism and Domination in a Dialectical Analysis of Un/Sustainability. Sustainable Development, 25(5), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1673
Harlow, J., Golub, A., & Allenby, B. (2013). A review of utopian themes in sustainable development discourse. Sustainable Development, 21(4), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.522
Huck, W. (2023). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In Sustainable Development Goals. Nomos/Hart. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509934058.0025
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. https://doi.org/10.2307/2072256
Jacob, M. (1997). Critical theory in political practice: Sustainable development and development theory. Science, Technology and Society, 2(1), 99–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172189700200104
Lefebvre, H. 1991 [1974]. The Production of Space. London: Blackwell.
_________.(1968). Le Droit à la Ville (The Right to the City). Paris: Anthropos.
Low, S., Taplin, D., & Scheld, S. (2005). Rethinking Urban Parks: Public space and cultural diversity. Rethinking Urban Parks: Public Space and Cultural Diversity (pp. 1–226). University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/4615042
Nsah, K. T. (2023). Conserving Africa’s Eden? Green Colonialism, Neoliberal Capitalism, and Sustainable Development in Congo Basin Literature. Humanities (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/h12030038
Olesen, T., & Phillips, R. (Eds.). (2008). Discourse Analysis Online: An Overview and Bibliography. Department of Language and Culture, Roskilde University.
Ostrom, E. (2009). A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Syatems. Science, 325, 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
Sakalasooriya, N. (2021). Conceptual Analysis of Sustainability and Sustainable Development. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 09(03), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.93026
Shatkin, G. (2017). Cities for profit: The real estate turn in Asia’s urban politics. Cities for Profit: The Real Estate Turn in Asia’s Urban Politics (pp. 1–274). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306119828696ll
Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking Spatial Justice. University of Minnesota Press.
Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah, F., Reyers, B., Kanie, N., … O’Connell, D. (2017). Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3
van Dijk, Teun A. Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, 2009.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Galang Geraldy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Â
